ArchRadar for Practices · Beta

Find the projects worth pursuing.

A separate workspace for architecture studios to review design competitions with office-specific eligibility, official-source evidence and bid / no-bid context.

This first beta slice is a product prototype. The sample brief below is not live procurement data.

Set only what you knowMissing office facts stay UNKNOWN. You can still evaluate the reviewed opportunities.

Read the verdict and reasonOpen each PASS / FAIL / UNKNOWN row to see why the rule was assigned.

Verify unresolved factsUse the official-source link before making a real bid / no-bid decision.

Office profile

Studio matching will use office capability and constraints instead of the Individual Fit profile.

Office region Architect / license status Architecture office registration G2B supplier registration Jeju partner readiness Structural-design partner readiness Telecom / fire / building-services partner readiness Years in practice Team size

Initial pilot: Korea-based practices. Profile data stays in this browser; evaluation requests are stateless.

Practice opportunity intelligence

The live beta will start small: source-backed Korean design competitions, analyzed deeply rather than listed broadly.

Not connected to live Studio data yet

SAMPLE · NOT LIVE DATA

Example public design competition

Contracting authority

Client—

Project location—

Design fee—

Construction budget—

Method—

Registration deadline—

Eligibility checks

PASS

Published requirement appears satisfied by the office profile.

FAIL

Published requirement conflicts with the office profile.

UNKNOWN

Source evidence or office data is incomplete. ArchRadar should not guess.

Evidence

Live Studio Beta will show official-source evidence and material changes here.

First real-data pilot

Target: roughly 20–30 current Korean design competitions with verified official provenance before any broad catalog expansion.